Child nutritional status as screening tool for identifying undernourished mothers: an observational study of mother–child dyads in Mogadishu, Somalia, from November 2019 to March 2020

External link

Original Article

Background: Active screening of only pregnant and lactating mothers (PLMs) excludes other mothers of reproductive age susceptible  undernutrition. Our analysis evaluated if mothers presenting with wasted children were more likely to be undernourished themselves.

Methods: The observational study enrolled mother and child dyads presenting to an outpatient facility in Mogadishu, Somalia, between November 2019 and March 2020. Trained nurses recorded lower extremity oedema for children aged 6–59 months, parity and gestational status for women aged 19–50 years and age, access to care, height/length, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and weight for both. Weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) for children and body mass index (BMI) for mothers were calculated using standard procedures. Wasting was defined as WHZ <−2, MUAC <12.5 cm and/or presence of oedema for children. Undernutrition was defined as MUAC <23 cm for PLMs and BMI <18.5 kg/m2 for neither pregnant nor lactating mothers (non-PLMs). Four multivariable linear regression models were fit to evaluate maternal anthropometric indicators (BMI or MUAC) given child anthropometric indicators (MUAC or WHZ), adjusting for maternal age, parity and gestational status.

Results: A total of 93.6% (2142/2288) of enrolled dyads met inclusion criteria. Wasting was observed among 57.5% of children; 20.2% of pregnant mothers, 20.0% of lactating mothers and 7.95% of non-PLMs were undernourished. Models suggest significant, positive associations between child and maternal anthropometrics; a one-unit increase in WHZ and a 1 cm increase in child MUAC were associated with 0.22 kg/m2 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.24) and 0.19 kg/m2 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.21) increases in maternal BMI, respectively, and 0.20 cm (95% CI 0.18 to 0.22) and 0.24 cm (95% CI 0.23 to 0.25) increases in maternal MUAC, respectively. Adjusted R2 values were low (range 0.06–0.10).

Conclusions: Undernutrition among non-PLMs illustrates the importance of expanding screening. However, while significant, the strength of association between mother and child anthropometrics does not support child nutritional status as a screening tool for identifying at-risk mothers.


Back to Top

People

Amany Qaddour

Dr. Qaddour is the director of the 501(c)(3) humanitarian NGO Syria Relief &...

Read More

Frances Stead Sellers

Frances Stead Sellers is an associate editor of The Washington Post. She has...

Read More

Takeru (Tak) Igusa

Takeru (Tak) Igusa is a professor of civil and systems engineering and a leading...

Read More

Meighan Mary

Ms. Mary is an Assistant Scientist in the International Health Department of the...

Read More

Natalya Kostandova

Dr. Natalya Kostandova is an epidemiologist, with training focused on infectious...

Read More

Events

S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
·
·
·
·