In introducing the new CHH–Lancet Commission on Health, Conflict, and Forced Displacement, Paul B Spiegel and colleagues argue that the humanitarian system to date requires systemic change.1 We agree, but believe that the Commission's efforts will fall short without a fundamental rejection of apolitical humanitarianism. Historical and contemporary crises, such as the ongoing genocide in Gaza, illustrate that apolitical humanitarianism undermines the field's effectiveness and its ability to respond to those most affected. Avoiding engagement with politics in humanitarian action maintains a broken system that prioritises powerful interests over the needs of individuals in humanitarian crises.